Worldsmith (Ade McT/interactive fables)

Screen Shot 2016-08-21 at 6.21.43 PM.png

Worldsmith belongs to a category that is still pretty rare, even in this age of growing opportunities for commercial IF: it’s for-sale parser IF. A demo is available for free, but the full version is $5.99. Not only that, but the author has collaborated with furkle (of SPY INTRIGUE fame) to skin an Inform 7 game with images, video, hyperlinks and custom menus. The surrounding images help communicate status information, with images of the NPCs you’re conversing with, and/or the planet you’re currently constructing.

Then there’s the gameplay. Worldsmith is heavy on both simulation and procedural text; I’ve seen a lot of authors start work that made ambitious use of those, but very few actually finish something of that scope and complexity.

The essential premise is that you are a world-builder in competition with several other world-builders (a very high-powered version of the Great British Bake-Off, perhaps). In order to do this, you must combine fundamental elements such as Air and Fire to make planets; set the planets in chosen orbits in your pet solar system; seed those planets with life; and then nurture the life to a degree of sentience that will survive in the wider universe and be able to leave its home planet before said planet becomes uninhabitable.

So far as I’ve seen, this is very much a systems game rather than a puzzle game. There is loads of information to learn about how various elements combine and what sorts of creatures they are likely to produce. Though you get a tutorial (a rather exasperated encounter with your teacher, who evidently feels that you really should have mastered the elements of world-construction by now), there’s a dizzying amount to retain, and you’ll likely find yourself reviewing your instruction manual quite a lot.

I haven’t managed to win. On the contrary, I’ve made a series of half-baked planets and seeded unsuccessful life on them, and needed to restart several times. (It turns out that if you teach your lifeforms too much too quickly, they’ll probably just destroy themselves, so slow up, Prometheus.) But I feel like I’m learning, so this is good restarting, rather than the bad frustrating restarting when a puzzle game has gone unwinnable.

In response to the decisions you make, your world is formed with differently described land forms, creatures, and technologies. It’s probably the closest thing to Spore-in-text-form that I’ve seen.

Still, eventually I realized that if I wanted to blog about this piece, I was going to have to go against my usual preference and write it up without having played the whole thing. So that’s a big caveat. I have some things to point out about Worldsmith but I have not seen anything near all of it, and certainly not most of its storyline.

Because there is a storyline, at least if you pick the Story option at startup. Your fellow contestants try to talk to you, and there are hints of a more global conspiracy. I haven’t finished the storyline either, because I’ve restarted so many times in an attempt to prevent my worlds from being awful. In fact, I found that because the game’s systems were so intricate, I was more exasperated than anything else when an NPC showed up to talk to me. (“Can’t you see I’m in the middle of shaping this world? Take your plot beat and get lost!”)

So after multiple iterations and failures, I switched to the available Game-only mode, where the story was omitted. I might at some point return and do the story once I’m more proficient at the game part. To judge by the review on IFDB, there is in fact quite a lot of story and perhaps a more conventional parser-game-style map that I could unlock at some point if only I managed to get these worlds to work properly.

Impressive though all this is, there are a few things that make the experience less hook-filled and less smooth than I’d like.

Getting started is rather thick going. There’s a lot of technical vocabulary introduced quickly; some of it is clearly functional and some of it ties in to lore about characters and the history of this universe. The following description is characteristic:

>x takwin
The Takwin is suspended above the Altar of Argestes by thick chains. It shines gold in the half light. Three shallow bowls, the Quaich, hold the ingredients of life. Clockwise, the three Quaich of the Takwin hold 5 urna of bile, 4 urna of blood and 6 urna of phlegm respectively. Each Quaich has a tap that allows you to draw off an ingredient into the shallow stone dish of the Altar.

This paragraph is asking us to assimilate quite a lot — the name of the Takwin, the name of the Altar, the name of the bowls, and the fact that the unit of measurement is an urn or urna — but the part of that description that you’re actually going to use (at least for the next 60+ moves of game time) could be boiled down to: “Your ingredients include 5 units of bile, 4 of blood, and 6 of phlegm.” Sure, add a bit of description to set the scene, but invented words are pretty much the opposite of description. I’ve never seen an urna, so I don’t know whether we’re talking about a teaspoon or a gallon; I don’t know whether the Quaiches are shallow and tiny like an ashtray or shallow and huge like a horse trough.

The tome you consult about in-world items is like that too: lots of technical information you need to absorb in order to get moving on world construction, interspersed with lots of references to lore you don’t yet understand. And there are many, many articles to read! Just to get started, you’ll probably need to read up on all three humors, six “eccentrics”, and five “basics”, not to mention the article that tells you what Teachings you can impart to your creatures, and the other article that gives you more background on those Teachings. So even though most articles are glossed with lore-rich footnotes, I soon found myself skimming, trying to get at the information I actually needed to go forward with my world-building, and feeling like a chef with a particularly uncooperative recipe book.

I would rather have had the world-making system introduced gradually through a series of layered challenges and a little more time to digest the information. Moreover, early moves of the game often feature loads of interactive objects, information, and hyperlinks, all competing for attention. If you’re the sort of person who feels overwhelmed when presented with too many options at once, you may also want to go cautiously with this one.

Daringly the game incorporates video with theme music as well — and uses that video as a cut scene that nonetheless tells part of the story in text. Then, too, the imagery isn’t as coherent as I would like, with some elements looking more photographic and some more stylized or cartoonish. The results of the JavaScript integration are technically impressive, but it would take a stronger design to make this look polished.

Nonetheless: this is a wildly ambitious game in multiple respects, and if you follow parser IF, it’s at the very least worth a look to see what it’s accomplished. For the right players, it may also be the delightful fulfillment of a long-held desire. Mix-your-own-recipe mechanics are unusual in finished IF, but more common in aspirations of IF. It’s just that very few people have managed to release such a game.

Disclaimer: I played a copy of this game that I received for free for review purposes.

12 thoughts on “Worldsmith (Ade McT/interactive fables)”

  1. This sounds awesome! I’ve been out of things for so long, but I may have to try this one. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

  2. I tried out the demo and was sold. I’m happy to support new IF endeavors and this one looks really interesting. Thanks for writing it up Emily! I never would have noticed it otherwise.

  3. Thanks for writing this out! I had some trouble with beating the opening game, too, but it was a bit easier only needing 1 planet to win (I think there’s a mode where you need all six? I haven’t tried it). After a lot of undo and restore, the thing that helped me the most was fghssvat nf znal uvtu-yriry grnpuvatf nf lbh pna va rnpu fgntr.

    1. Interesting! I’d assumed that cneg bs gur ernfba zl pvivyvmngvbaf jrer frys-qrfgehpgvat jnf gung V jnf tvivat gurz gbb znal grnpuvatf naq/be abg tvivat gurz rabhtu bs gur ybj-yriry barf gb fhccbeg uvture-yriry barf. (V jnfa’g dhvgr fher jurgure gurer jnf na vzcyrzragrq grpu gerr-glcr guvat be abg.)

      1. I only played the demo so far, but I found that V pbhyq hfhnyyl grnpu n pvivyvmngvba hc gb guerr grnpuvatf cre ntr orsber gurl’q trg erfgyrff, vapyhqvat gur barf gurl yrnearq ba gurve bja, fb nsgre sbhe ntrf, gurl’q unir gjryir grnpuvatf, guerr sebz rnpu bs gur sbhe yriryf. Rnpu grnpuvat nyfb hfhnyyl qvq pbafvfgrag guvatf gb gur yvsrsbez’f nggevohgrf, fb V pbhyq znavchyngr gubfr nggevohgrf. Ba zl svefg gel, V znantrq gb jva gjb bs fvk, naq n guveq bar ybbxrq yvxr vg jnf tbvat gb jva (vg unq gjryir grnpuvatf naq onynaprq nggevohgrf) ohg gura whfg qvqa’g naq V qba’g xabj jul. V zvtug unir jba gur ynfg bar gbb vs gur grfg unqa’g orra vagreehcgrq. Ohg gung jnf bayl nsgre gnxvat n ybg bs pnershy abgrf sebz gur obbx nobhg juvpu ryrzragf cynl jryy gbtrgure naq gur rssrpgf bs inevbhf grnpuvatf naq fhpu.

  4. Emily, your review was good enough to keep me reading despite my allergy to parser games (and things that are, like, hard and stuff) but Brian won the “spits out drink and has to read to family members” award today.

  5. Thanks for writing about this. I played the demo, and as you say, it’s very ambitious but seems only a little rough around the edges, which is fabulous. (One minor glitch is that conversations will repeat unchanged if the other person hasn’t walked away. Maybe that’s intentional so that you can reread it if you want to, but from a story perspective it doesn’t make any sense.) The amount of vocabulary and lore didn’t bother me a bit, but I’m the type to actually read the manual. Then I wrote out a strategy for my planets and lifeforms after the second one in order to fit the available materials into good combinations based on the book’s recommendations.

    I think in the end, the graphical elements are beautiful but less helpful than they could have been. If this were a graphical game rather than a parser game, you’d probably have a much better visual sense of how the elements interact, with tooltips or something for the attributes of the various elements, so there wouldn’t have to be nearly so much consulting of the book just to get something reasonable. It’s not a very casual sort of game. I took extensive notes in order to figure out a reasonable strategy.

    I kept expecting the demo to stop partway through the test and was astounded at the implications of gameplay volume from where it did stop, nevermind the plot revelations. I will have to pick this one up to find out more.

Leave a Reply to Brian Rushton Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: